Pitfalls in HTTP traffic measurements and analysis

20Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Being responsible for more than half of the total traffic volume in the Internet, HTTP is a popular subject for traffic analysis. From our experiences with HTTP traffic analysis we identified a number of pitfalls which can render a carefully executed study flawed. Often these pitfalls can be avoided easily. Based on passive traffic measurements of 20.000 European residential broadband customers, we quantify the potential error of three issues: Non-consideration of persistent or pipelined HTTP requests, mismatches between the Content-Type header field and the actual content, and mismatches between the Content-Length header and the actual transmitted volume. We find that 60% (30%) of all HTTP requests (bytes) are persistent (i.e., not the first in a TCP connection) and 4% are pipelined. Moreover, we observe a Content-Type mismatch for 35% of the total HTTP volume. In terms of Content-Length accuracy our data shows a factor of at least 3.2 more bytes reported in the HTTP header than actually transferred. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneider, F., Ager, B., Maier, G., Feldmann, A., & Uhlig, S. (2012). Pitfalls in HTTP traffic measurements and analysis. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7192 LNCS, pp. 242–251). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28537-0_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free