Revisiting traditional risk factors for rejection and graft loss after kidney transplantation

169Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Single-antigen bead (SAB) testing permits reassessment of immunologic risk for kidney transplantation. Traditionally, high panel reactive antibody (PRA), retransplant and deceased donor (DD) grafts have been associated with increased risk. We hypothesized that this risk was likely mediated by (unrecognized) donor-specific antibody (DSA). We grouped 587 kidney transplants using clinical history and single-antigen bead (SAB) testing of day of transplant serum as (1) unsensitized; PRA = 0 (n = 178), (2) third-party sensitized; no DSA (n = 363) or (3) donor sensitized; with DSA (n = 46), and studied rejection rates, death-censored graft survival (DCGS) and risk factors for rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rates were increased with DSA (p < 0.0001), but not with panel reactive antibody (PRA) in the absence of DSA. Cell-mediated rejection (CMR) rates were increased with DSA (p < 0.005); with a trend to increased rates when PRA>0 in the absence of DSA (p = 0.08). Multivariate analyses showed risk factors for AMR were DSA, worse HLA matching, and female gender; for CMR: DSA, PRA>0 and worse HLA matching. AMR and CMR were associated with decreased DCGS. The presence of DSA is an important predictor of rejection risk, in contrast to traditional risk factors. Further development of immunosuppressive protocols will be facilitated by stratification of rejection risk by donor sensitization. © 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

References Powered by Scopus

The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology

2852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions

1699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - An addition to the Banff '97 classification of renal allograft rejection

990Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and Non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: Current status and novel approaches

303Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Donor-specific antibodies adversely affect kidney allograft outcomes

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dunn, T. B., Noreen, H., Gillingham, K., Maurer, D., Ozturk, O. G., Pruett, T. L., … Matas, A. J. (2011). Revisiting traditional risk factors for rejection and graft loss after kidney transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation, 11(10), 2132–2143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03640.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

57%

Researcher 14

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 48

69%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

14%

Immunology and Microbiology 9

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free