Evaluation of echocardiography indices of systolic function: A comparative study using pressure-volume loops in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

18Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Transoesophageal echocardiography measures of systolic left ventricular function obtained during coronary artery bypass surgery are heavily influenced by alterations in loading conditions. No validation of these measurements against load independent indices obtained by pressure-volume loop analysis has been undertaken in humans. Ten patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery underwent simultaneous transoesophageal echocardiography and pressure-volume loop analysis of cardiac function at different loading conditions (reduced preload, increased afterload and atrial pacing). Fractional area change, afterload corrected fractional area change, and lateral basal wall peak systolic myocardial velocity, along with dP/dt, were compared to the preload recruitable stroke work relationship. There were no significant differences between the echocardiography measures when compared to the preload recruitable stroke work relationship; however, dP/dt varied significantly across loading conditions (p < 0.001). Transoesophageal echocardiography adequately assesses systolic function across loading conditions commonly seen during coronary artery bypass surgery. © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Royse, C. F., Connelly, K. A., MacLaren, G., & Royse, A. G. (2007). Evaluation of echocardiography indices of systolic function: A comparative study using pressure-volume loops in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. In Anaesthesia (Vol. 62, pp. 109–116). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04911.x

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

47%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

27%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

93%

Engineering 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0