Beyond gatekeeping: Propaganda, democracy, and the organization of digital publics

14Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While there is disagreement as to the severity of the digital disinformation problem, scholars and practitioners have largely coalesced around the idea that a new system of safeguards is needed to prevent its spread. By minimizing the role of citizens in managing their own communities, however, I argue that these gatekeeping approaches are undemocratic. To develop a more democratic alternative, I draw from the work of Harold D. Lasswell and John Dewey to argue that we should study the organization of digital publics. For citizens to engage in democratic inquiry, publics must be organized so that they can (1) easily identify their common interests and (2) regularly encounter variety. I then analyze Facebook, showing how the News Feed and Facebook Groups together create a platform on which propagandists can effectively target and manipulate specific publics. I conclude by turning to Reddit to suggest alternative forms of organizing digital publics more democratically.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forestal, J. (2021). Beyond gatekeeping: Propaganda, democracy, and the organization of digital publics. Journal of Politics, 83(1), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/709300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free