BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extravasation of iodinated contrast into subdural space following contrast-enhanced radiographic studies results in hyperdense subdural effusions, which can be mistaken as acute subdural hematomas on follow-up noncontrast head CTs. Our aim was to identify the factors associated with contrast-enhancing subdural effusion, characterize diffusion and washout kinetics of iodine in enhancing subdural effusion, and assess the utility of dual-energy CT in differentiating enhancing subdural effusion from subdural hematoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed follow-up head dual-energy CT studies in 423 patients with polytrauma who had undergone contrast-enhanced whole-body CT. Twenty-four patients with enhancing subdural effusion composed the study group, and 24 randomly selected patients with subdural hematoma were enrolled in the comparison group. Postprocessing with syngo.via was performed to determine the diffusion and washout kinetics of iodine. The sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of enhancing subdural effusion were determined with 120-kV, virtual monochromatic energy (190-keV) and virtual noncontrast images. RESULTS: Patients with enhancing subdural effusion were significantly older (mean, 69 years; 95% CI, 60-78 years; P = .001) and had a higher incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (P
CITATION STYLE
Bodanapally, U. K., Dreizin, X. D., Issa, G., Archer-Arroyo, K. L., Sudini, K., & Fleiter, T. R. (2017). Dual-energy CT in enhancing subdural effusions that masquerade as subdural hematomas: Diagnosis with virtual high-monochromatic (190-keV) images. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 38(10), 1946–1952. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5318
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.