Impact on caregivers of patients with eye diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The burden on caregivers of patients with eye disease is exacerbated by competing priorities and their own advancing age. The objective of this paper is to identify and characterize the burden of caregiving for patients with eye diseases. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted accessing the main databases up to March 25, 2021: Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and PubMed. Studies included referred to the burden experienced by caregivers of adults with any eye disease. Review studies, editorials, commentaries, opinion studies, and single case reports were excluded as well as studies that described only the quality of life and (or) burdens of the care recipient. Two independent reviewers carried 2-level screening. Risk of bias assessment was determined according to the Modified Downs and Black Checklist. Demographic data and measures of burden were extracted and tabulated. Results: In total, 2421 articles were identified after duplicate removal; 17 progressed to data extraction after full-text screening, and 7 were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, caregiving was associated with significant burden (65%; 95% CI, 12%–17%). Meta-analysis indicated significant severe burden (24%; 95% CI, 3%–45%), moderate burden (18%; 95% CI, 9%–28%), and mild burden (34%; 95% CI, 7%–61%) on caregivers of visually impaired patients. Conclusions: Awareness of the psychosocial impact and risk of severe burden experienced by caregivers of eye disease patients is required to aid health care providers to develop proactive interventions for both providers and recipients of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pur, D. R., Bassi, A., & Malvankar-Mehta, M. S. (2023). Impact on caregivers of patients with eye diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 58(5), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.04.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free