Comparison of clinical outcomes of gastrojejunal bypass and gastrectomy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Surgical therapy for stage IV gastric cancer patients is still debatable. The clinical outcomes were compared between gastrojejunal bypass and gastrectomy for metastatic gastric cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 110 patients with metastatic gastric cancer who underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-nine patients underwent gastrojejunal bypass (group B) and 81 underwent gastrectomy (group G). Results: There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival between Group G patients with partial gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. However, patients in group G had a significantly better prognosis compared to patients in group B (p=0.01 and 0.03, respectively). The prognosis of patients with postoperative chemotherapy was significantly better in group G compared to group B (p=0.03), whereas it was not significantly different for the patients without postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.24). Conclusion: Gastrectomy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer may improve survival when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsubara, D., Konishi, H., Kubota, T., Kosuga, T., Shoda, K., Shiozaki, A., … Otsuji, E. (2019). Comparison of clinical outcomes of gastrojejunal bypass and gastrectomy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Anticancer Research, 39(5), 2545–2551. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free