Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap

16Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to the food security and nutrition of low-income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscation of milk, or closing the premises of informal actors. Purpose: This article seeks to better understand if, and why, Kenya’s informal milk sector and regulatory system are disconnected from one another and how the policy–reality gap might be better bridged. Methods and approach: To understand the nature and performance of Kenya’s informal milk markets and their governance, we used a mix of research methods and data sources, including surveys with informal market players, and key informant interviews with key sector stakeholders. Fieldwork was carried out in Nairobi in late 2018. Findings: Milk safety and quality matters to all actors in informal milk value chains. The trust-based system used is effective in moderating behaviours and assessing and prioritizing quality and safety. Government policy is not accomplishing the stated goal of formalization: licensing levels remain low among informal actors. Pasteurization is not rewarded in the market. There is some evidence of suboptimal pasteurization processes being undertaken to satisfy regulators. There is a gap between the reality of Kenya’s informal milk sector and its regulatory system. Policy implications: The regulation–reality gap manifests itself as adversarial relationships between regulators and informal actors, and unnecessary transaction costs, missing opportunities for enhancing livelihoods, food safety, and food security. New approaches should build on and consider existing approaches taken by actors in informal food markets to ensure food safety and quality. Policy-makers should seek to communicate more effectively with informal actors and engage in more constructive dialogue on inclusive ways forward.

References Powered by Scopus

Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning

1537Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food safety in low and middle income countries

305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The glass of milk half-empty? Dairy development and nutrition in low and middle income countries

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring the composition and structure of milk and meat value chains, food safety risks and governance in the Addis Ababa and Oromia regions of Ethiopia

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The governance of quality and safety in Tanzania's informal milk markets

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blackmore, E., Guarin, A., Vorley, W., Alonso, S., & Grace, D. (2022). Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap. Development Policy Review, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12581

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

58%

Researcher 13

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17

53%

Social Sciences 8

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

16%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free