Traditional and Digital Biomarkers: Two Worlds Apart?

107Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The identification and application of biomarkers in the clinical and medical fields has an enormous impact on society. The increase of digital devices and the rise in popularity of health-related mobile apps has produced a new trove of biomarkers in large, diverse, and complex data. However, the unclear definition of digital biomarkers, population groups, and their intersection with traditional biomarkers hinders their discovery and validation. We have identified current issues in the field of digital biomarkers and put forth suggestions to address them during the DayOne Workshop with participants from academia and industry. We have found similarities and differences between traditional and digital biomarkers in order to synchronize semantics, define unique features, review current regulatory procedures, and describe novel applications that enable precision medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babrak, L. M., Menetski, J., Rebhan, M., Nisato, G., Zinggeler, M., Brasier, N., … Miho, E. (2019). Traditional and Digital Biomarkers: Two Worlds Apart? Digital Biomarkers, 3(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free