Quatro semanas de treinamento com restrição de fluxo sanguineo aumenta o tempo de exaustão em exercício severo no ciclismo

12Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study aimed to verify the effects of 4 weeks of low-intensity blood flow restricted (BFR) training on time to exhaustion (Tlim) at severe-intensity exercise. Thirteen physically active subjects (23 ± 3.4 years; 70.6 ± 7.8 kg; 170.9 ± 10 cm) were assigned to one of two groups: low-intensity interval training with (BFR, n=9) or without (CON, n=4) blood flow restricted. The interval training sessions consisted of 2 sets of 5-8 × 2-min intervals at 30% of peak power output (PPeak) obtained during incremental exercise for LOW and BFR, separated by 1min of rest. For BFR a cuff was inflated (140-200mmHg) during the exercise bouts and deflated during rest intervals. The pressure was increased 20mmHg after three completed sessions, thus, in the last week the pressure applied was 200mmHg. Before and after 4 weeks intervention period, all subjects completed an incremental exercise until exhaustion and one-step transition to a severe-intensity work rate (110%PPeak). The results revealed that BFR (Pre: 227 ± 44s vs. Post: 338 ± 76s), but not CON (Pre: 236 ± 24s vs. Post: 212 ± 26s), increase significantly Tlim at 110%PPeak. It can be concluded that 4 weeks of BFR training, but not CON, increased the exercise tolerance at severe intensity domain. Therefore, the increased metabolic and physiologic strains induced by BFR, not the exercise intensity per se (30%PPeak), seem to have been responsible to trigger the adaptive responses linked to longer Tlim after BFR training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corvino, R. B., Oliveira, M. F. M. de, Santos, R. P. dos, Denadai, B. S., & Caputo, F. (2014). Quatro semanas de treinamento com restrição de fluxo sanguineo aumenta o tempo de exaustão em exercício severo no ciclismo. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 16(5), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2014v16n5p570

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free