Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations

1.6kCitations
Citations of this article
262Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using a spectral-type cumulus parameterization that includes moist downdrafts within a three-dimensional mesoscale model, various disparate closure assumptions are systematically tested within the generalized framework. The dynamic control is the part that determines the modulation of the convection by the environment. It is shown that rate of destabilization, as well as instantaneous stability, work well for the dynamic control. Integrated moisture convergence leads to underprediction of rainfall rates and subsequent degrading of the results in terms of movement and structure of the mesoscale convective system (MCS). The feedback determines the modification of the environment by the convection, and in this study is considered together with the static control, which determines cloud properties. All feedback and static-control assumptions tested here seem very important for the prediction of sea level pressure and rainfall. -from Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grell, G. A. (1993). Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Monthly Weather Review, 121(3), 764–787. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<0764:PEOAUB>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free