Can we develop simple response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs?

17Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The conventional assessment of response to slow acting antirheumatic drugs depends on multiple clinical and laboratory measures. Each measure is analysed separately. For clinical practice and therapeutic trials a single unified classification of response is preferable, based on the most sensitive and simple current measures. Whether or not this was practical was determined in a prospective study of two cohorts of patients: 145 given penicillamine 250-500 mg daily in a single dose; 98 sulphasalazine at an initial dose of 500 mg rising after one month to 2 g daily. Both groups were followed up for 12 months. A panel of 11 clinical and laboratory measures were evaluated every three to six months. Most changes had occurred by six months, and this was the optimum time to classify response. Four measures were used to devise a five point (0-4) classification of response from no change to remission. The objective was to evaluate if this approach is appropriate; the best level of each measure to use was not determined. The response index was based on: erythrocyte sedimentation rate <30 mm/h; articular index <3; morning stiffness <15 min; >50% reduction in joint pain. Similar results were obtained with both drugs. The other clincial and laboratory measures gave limited information. This response index is simple and appropriate. It is suitable for use in clinical practice and drug studies, though the optimal values for dividing each clinical and laboratory variable need to be determined.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): Interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: Combinations of disease-modifying drugs and new paradigms of treatment

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early, aggressive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: Concerns, descriptions, and estimate of outcome

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, D. L., Dacre, J. E., Greenwood, A., Treasure, L., & Huskisson, E. C. (1990). Can we develop simple response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs? Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 49(3), 196–198. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.49.3.196

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Psychology 2

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free