Termination of nontraumatic cardiac arrest resuscitative efforts in the field: A national survey

17Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To describe elements of adult nontraumatic cardiac arrest protocols in those U.S. cities in which resuscitative efforts are being terminated in the out-of-hospital setting. 2) To determine the prevalence and methods of on-scene family grief counseling delivered in this setting. Methods: Emergency medical services (EMS) systems in each of the 200 largest cities in the United States were surveyed by telephone regarding the content of their adult cardiac arrest protocols. Type of arrest (medical vs trauma), final dysrhythmia, termination policies, and presence or absence of a grief counseling protocol were recorded. Results: All of the target population responded to the telephone survey. Most (135; 68%) EMS systems currently have written protocols that allow in-field termination of resuscitative efforts for adult nontraumatic cardiac arrest patients who remain asystolic. Only 47 (24%) EMS systems allow cessation of efforts for patients without return of spontaneous circulation regardless of the dysrhythmia. Base station contact is required for authorization to end resuscitative efforts in 120/135 (89%) EMS systems. Only 26/135 (19%) EMS systems that cease efforts in the field have written policies concerning on-scene family grief counseling. This counseling is most likely to be conducted by the out-of-hospital providers themselves. Conclusion: Many U.S. urban EMS systems are terminating efforts for selected adult nontraumatic cardiac arrest patients, although few have written policies to address grief intervention for family members at the scene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jaslow, D., Barbera, J. A., Johnson, E., & Moore, W. (1997). Termination of nontraumatic cardiac arrest resuscitative efforts in the field: A national survey. Academic Emergency Medicine, 4(9), 904–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03817.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free