Correcting gradient-based interpretations of deep neural networks for genomics

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Post hoc attribution methods can provide insights into the learned patterns from deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on high-throughput functional genomics data. However, in practice, their resultant attribution maps can be challenging to interpret due to spurious importance scores for seemingly arbitrary nucleotides. Here, we identify a previously overlooked attribution noise source that arises from how DNNs handle one-hot encoded DNA. We demonstrate this noise is pervasive across various genomic DNNs and introduce a statistical correction that effectively reduces it, leading to more reliable attribution maps. Our approach represents a promising step towards gaining meaningful insights from DNNs in regulatory genomics.

References Powered by Scopus

BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features

16614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification

15736Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Array programming with NumPy

13965Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interpreting cis-regulatory mechanisms from genomic deep neural networks using surrogate models

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive analyses of regulatory sequences with EUGENe

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Majdandzic, A., Rajesh, C., & Koo, P. K. (2023). Correcting gradient-based interpretations of deep neural networks for genomics. Genome Biology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02956-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 4

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

64%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Physics and Astronomy 1

9%

Computer Science 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free