The majority of Danish breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy have clinically relevant sexual dysfunction: a cross-sectional study

8Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Impairments in sexual function are common among breast cancer survivors (BCSs), particularly in BCSs receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). Whether these impairments cause distress, thus qualifying for a more clinically relevant diagnosis of sexual dysfunction (SD), is inadequately described among BCSs and represents an important research gap. Hence, the primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of clinically relevant SD, in this context: impairments with associated distress, and to identify factors associated with SD among BCSs on AET. Secondly, to explore the extent of distress caused by specific impairments in sexual function. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study of BCSs on adjuvant treatment with endocrine therapy for at least three months, participants completed an online survey comprising standardized measures of sexual and psychosocial function. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Sexual Complaint Screener–Women (SCS-W) were used to asses clinically relevant SD. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with SD. Results: In total, 333 BCSs with a mean age of 58.7 years were included in the study, of whom 227 were sexually active. Among sexually active BCSs, 134 (59%) met the criteria for having clinically relevant SD, of whom 78 (58%) perceived cancer treatment as the primary reason for their sexual problems. Factors associated with SD included vaginal dryness (adjusted OR= 2.25, 95% CI: 1.52–3.34, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fogh, M., Højgaard, A., Rotbøl, C. B., & Jensen, A. B. (2021). The majority of Danish breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy have clinically relevant sexual dysfunction: a cross-sectional study. Acta Oncologica, 60(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1813326

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free