Comparison of colorectal and endometrial microsatellite instability tumor analysis and premm5 risk assessment for predicting pathogenic germline variants on multigene panel testing

8Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE Tumor testing for microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair-deficiency (MSI/IHC) and clinical prediction models effectively screen for Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), but they have not been assessed for their ability to identify non-LS forms of inherited risk. The aim of this study was to compare MSI/IHC and the PREMM5 prediction model to identify carriers of LS and non-LS pathogenic variants (PVs) among patients with CRC and EC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively analyzed from two single-institution cohorts: 706 patients with CRC and/or EC referred for genetic evaluation/testing (high-risk cohort) and 1,058 consecutively ascertained patients with CRC (oncology clinic cohort), unselected for familial risk. All participants underwent germline multigene panel testing. PREMM5 scores were calculated from personal/family cancer history. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with germline PVs (LS PVs, high-penetrance PVs, and any PVs) who had abnormal MSI/IHC testing and/or PREMM5 score $ 2.5%. RESULTS MSI/IHC and PREMM5 had comparable sensitivity for identifying LS carriers in high-risk (89.3% v 85.7%; P 5.712) and oncology clinic patients (96.6% v 96.6%; P 5 1.000), although MSI/IHC had significantly superior specificity for LS (81.3% v 20.1%; P,.001; 92.3% v 24.3%; P,.001). In both cohorts, PREMM5 had superior sensitivity to MSI/IHC at identifying patients with any high-penetrance PVs and any low-, moderate-, and high-penetrance PVs. Among patients with normal MSI/IHC, PREMM5 identified 84.2% and 83.3% of high-risk patients with CRC/EC and oncology clinic CRC patients with high-penetrance PVs, respectively. CONCLUSION MSI/IHC and PREMM5 effectively identify patients with CRC and/or EC with LS, although MSI/IHC has better specificity for LS. Because PREMM5 identifies non-LS, high-penetrance germline PVs, patients with CRC and/or EC with PREMM5 score $ 2.5%, including those with normal MSI/IHC, should be offered multigene panel testing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mannucci, A., Sloane Furniss, C., Ukaegbu, C., Horiguchi, M., Fehlmann, T., Uno, H., … Syngal, S. (2020). Comparison of colorectal and endometrial microsatellite instability tumor analysis and premm5 risk assessment for predicting pathogenic germline variants on multigene panel testing. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(34), 4086–4094. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01470

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free