State of Science in Alarm System Safety: Implications for Researchers, Vendors, and Clinical Leaders

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Alarm fatigue is a complex phenomenon that needs to be assessed within the context of the clinical setting. Considering that complexity, the available information on how to address alarm fatigue and improve alarm system safety is relatively scarce. This article summarizes the state of science in alarm system safety based on the eight dimensions of a sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. The summary and recommendations were guided by available systematic reviews on the topic, interventional studies published between January 2019 and February 2022, and recommendations and evidence-based practice interventions published by professional organizations. The current article suggests implications to help researchers respond to the gap in science related to alarm safety, help vendors design safe monitoring systems, and help clinical leaders apply evidence-based strategies to improve alarm safety in their settings. Physiologic monitors in intensive care units—the devices most commonly used in complex care environments and associated with the highest number of alarms and deaths—are the focus of the current work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sowan, A. K., Staggers, N., Reed, C. C., Austin, T., Chen, Q., Xu, S., & Lopez, E. (2022). State of Science in Alarm System Safety: Implications for Researchers, Vendors, and Clinical Leaders. Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology. Allen Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-56.1.19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free