Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We showed that judgments of learning (JOLs) were not affected by presentation modality in a list-learning task, although the typical font-size and loudness illusions emerged in that large-font visual presentations and loud auditory presentations elicited higher JOLs than their less intense counterparts. Further, when items were presented in both modalities simultaneously, large-font/quiet and small-font/loud items received similar JOLs (and were recalled similarly). Most importantly, when the intensity manipulation was compounded across modalities, the magnitude of the illusion increased beyond that observed in a single modality, showing the influence of combining cues. Whereas recall was still the same, large-font/loud items received higher JOLs than either small-font/loud items or large-font/quiet items, and not-intense items received very low JOLs. These differences emerged only when all conditions were presented within a single list and not in a between-subjects design, underscoring the importance of comparative judgments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peynircioğlu, Z. F., & Tatz, J. R. (2019). Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations. Memory and Cognition, 47(3), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0875-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free