Infant formulae supplemented with prebiotics: Are they better than unsupplemented formulae? An updated systematic review

53Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2011, the Committee on Nutrition of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition systematically reviewed published evidence related to the safety and health effects of the administration of formulae supplemented with pro- and/or prebiotics compared with unsupplemented formulae. We updated evidence on the effects of the administration of prebiotic-supplemented infant formulae (IF) compared with unsupplemented IF. Five databases were searched up to March 2017 for randomised controlled trials. In all, forty-one publications were identified, including twenty-five new publications. The administration of currently evaluated prebiotic-supplemented formulae to healthy infants does not raise safety concerns with regard to growth and adverse effects. Some favourable clinical effects are possible, primarily stool softening, which may be beneficial in some infants. Currently, there is no existing robust evidence to recommend the routine use of prebiotic-supplemented formulae. The latter conclusion may reflect the small amount of data on specific prebiotics and outcomes, rather than a genuine lack of an effect. The efficacy and safety should be considered for each prebiotic(s)-supplemented formula.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skórka, A., Pieścik-Lech, M., Kołodziej, M., & Szajewska, H. (2018, April 14). Infant formulae supplemented with prebiotics: Are they better than unsupplemented formulae? An updated systematic review. British Journal of Nutrition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114518000120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free