The Effect of Net Play on Forearm Passing Ability on Junior High School Level Inclusion Schools

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of net play on forearm passing ability in inclusion school students at the junior high school level. The design of this study is a Group Pretest-posttest design. The participants of this study were obtained using a random sampling technique, namely male students who took part in volleyball extracurricular in an inclusion school totaling 25 students. The instrument used is the forearm passing ability test. Data analyses used descriptive statistics and t-tests. The results showed that the t-count value of 5.047 versus t of table 2,060 (df = 25) at a significance level of 5% because t count is greater than the t-table, there is a significant difference. Judging from the average value, the average pretest value = 30.12 and the posttest average value = 34.87, then the effect of increasing the Forearm passing ability through the net game practice method is = 4. 75 or 1 5.77%. The contribution of this research is to the next researcher so that in researching can pay attention to the things that are within the limitations of this study and develop net game methods and other methods to improve the ability to pass down.

References Powered by Scopus

432Citations
973Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

5Citations
36Readers
2Citations
23Readers
Get full text
1Citations
15Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phytanza, D. T. P., Burhaein, E., Lourenço, C. C. V., & Andika, A. (2022). The Effect of Net Play on Forearm Passing Ability on Junior High School Level Inclusion Schools. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(5), 1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2022.100525

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

43%

Sports and Recreations 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0