Predicting Readmission or Death after Discharge from the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model

21Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many machine learning (ML) models have been developed for application in the ICU, but few models have been subjected to external validation. The performance of these models in new settings therefore remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of an existing decision support tool based on a ML model predicting readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge before, during, and after retraining and recalibration. DESIGN: A gradient boosted ML model was developed and validated on electronic health record data from 2004 to 2021. We performed an independent validation of this model on electronic health record data from 2011 to 2019 from a different tertiary care center. SETTING: Two ICUs in tertiary care centers in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Adult patients who were admitted to the ICU and stayed for longer than 12 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed discrimination by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration (slope and intercept). We retrained and recalibrated the original model and assessed performance via a temporal validation design. The final retrained model was cross-validated on all data from the new site. Readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge occurred in 577 of 10,052 ICU admissions (5.7%) at the new site. External validation revealed moderate discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76). Retrained models showed improved discrimination with AUC 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.82) for the final validation model. Calibration was poor initially and good after recalibration via isotonic regression. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of expanding availability of ML models, external validation and retraining are key steps to consider before applying ML models to new settings. Clinicians and decision-makers should take this into account when considering applying new ML models to their local settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions

3869Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures

3470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models

3457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Perspectives on validation of clinical predictive algorithms

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence to advance acute and intensive care medicine

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Possibilities and challenges for artificial intelligence and machine learning in perioperative care

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Hond, A. A. H., Kant, I. M. J., Fornasa, M., Cinà, G., Elbers, P. W. G., Thoral, P. J., … Steyerberg, E. W. (2023). Predicting Readmission or Death after Discharge from the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model. Critical Care Medicine, 51(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005758

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

23%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

50%

Computer Science 2

20%

Engineering 2

20%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free