Cooking in theory: Risky events in the structure of the conjuncture

8Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What could the practice of everyday cooking contribute to anthropological theory? I consider this question in developing my own approach to cooking, drawing from a modified version of Marshall Sahlins’ theory of historical practice. Thinking through key concepts from Sahlins, including ‘the structure of the conjuncture’ and ‘the risk of categories in practice,’ I suggest some of the ways this might be applied to the practice of cooking, and I argue that, indeed, such an approach – one that recognizes the role of recipes as well as of improvisation – fills a gap left in understandings of cooking based on strictly phenomenological approaches such as that of Tim Ingold. I argue that a modified Sahlinsian approach can help us understand the daily reproduction and change that happens each time a recognizable dish is cooked. I then suggest some of the ways that my own research on Greek cooking lends itself to thinking about risky practices. Finally, I suggest that doing ethnography informed by this approach will not only illuminate our kitchen lives but will provide a valuable model for ethnographic studies of the historical processes involved in changes in daily life more broadly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutton, D. (2018). Cooking in theory: Risky events in the structure of the conjuncture. Anthropological Theory, 18(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617724319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free