Surgical Treatment of Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fracture by Minimally Invasive Technique: Description and Preliminary Results

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective The present paper aimed to evaluate functional and radiographic outcomes from a group of patients with comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture who were surgically treated using a minimally invasive technique and followed-up for a minimum period of 12 months. Methods Longitudinal, observational study with 32 consecutive patients (31 males; mean age, 41 years old) with comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture who were surgically treated using the minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate in the upper position. Patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated for a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Results In 30 patients (93.72%), fracture consolidation occurred in an average time of 17 weeks (range, 12 to 24 weeks). The mean follow-up time was 21 months (range, 12 to 45 months). No implant break or pseudoarthrosis were recorded. There was no complaint of paresthesia around the surgical incisions. The surgically-treated shoulder presented lower passive elevation and longer clavicle length (p < 0.05) compared with the contralateral shoulder. Functional evaluation revealed an average Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score of 1.75, which is considered satisfactory. Age > 60 years old had a negative correlation with DASH score (p <0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique was satisfactory for the treatment of comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture, with a high consolidation rate and a low complication rate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendes Junior, A. F., Mota Neto, J. D., Oppe, I. G., De Simoni, L. F., Giordano, V., & Labronici, P. J. (2021). Surgical Treatment of Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fracture by Minimally Invasive Technique: Description and Preliminary Results. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 56(4), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free