Edmund Husserl, Hannah Arendt and a Phenomenology of Nature

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I would like to investigate in this chapter what at first might seem a difficult position: a phenomenology of nature in an Arendtian vein. It might seem that such a position would be fundamentally anthropocentric given the tendencies of phenomenology to begin from the subject position and, in particular, given Arendt’s focus on how the human being differs from “nature.” What I would like to tease out, however, are the ways in which phenomenology and Arendt can help us to understand nature not as something over against which we formulate ourselves, nor as some thing that is in itself, but as that with which we are intimately intertwined and without which we are not. I will begin by describing generally how we can conceive of a phenomenology of nature through Husserl’s notion of lifeworld. Then, I will examine how Arendt’s notion of the vita activa supports a phenomenology of nature that is neither anthropocentric nor objectifying of nature, but is an interweaving of human and world. Finally, I will show how this phenomenological understanding offers us a richer way to conceive of ourselves in relation to other beings and to the world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donohoe, J. (2017). Edmund Husserl, Hannah Arendt and a Phenomenology of Nature. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 89, pp. 175–188). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56160-8_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free