Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a study protocol for a retrospective cohort study

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) comprise <3% of all fractures in children and adolescents. While it is accepted that minimally displaced PHFs can be treated conservatively, the management of severely displaced PHFs remains controversial, especially in older children. This study will aim to analyse the functional and quality-of-life outcomes of children with PHFs, in order to inform their optimal management. Methods and analysis We will conduct a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of patients who were diagnosed with a paediatric PHF at the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH) in South Australia. The primary outcome will be each participant's pain and quality-of-life outcome, determined by use of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Secondary outcomes will include rates of non-union, persistent deformity and complications. The information for these variables will be acquired during a brief clinic appointment, and from the medical records and WCH radiology database. Multivariable logistic regression will be performed to determine the clinical variables associated with a worse clinical outcome. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Women's and Children's Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol number: 2021/HRE00250). The study findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals for publication and disseminated at conference presentations. Trial registration number Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000176763).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abbot, S. R., Proudman, S., Hall, K., & Williams, N. (2022). Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a study protocol for a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free