Caspofungin etest susceptibility testing of Candida species: Risk of misclassification of susceptible isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei when adopting the revised CLSI caspofungin breakpoints

59Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of caspofungin Etest and the recently revised CLSI breakpoints. A total of 497 blood isolates, of which 496 were wild-type isolates, were included. A total of 65/496 susceptible isolates (13.1%) were misclassified as intermediate (I) or resistant (R). Such misclassifications were most commonly observed for Candida krusei (73.1%) and Candida glabrata (33.1%). The revised breakpoints cannot be safely adopted for these two species. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arendrup, M. C., Pfaller, M. A., Arendrup, M. C., Dzajic, E., Johansen, H. K., Kjældgaard, P., … Schønheyder, H. C. (2012). Caspofungin etest susceptibility testing of Candida species: Risk of misclassification of susceptible isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei when adopting the revised CLSI caspofungin breakpoints. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 56(7), 3965–3968. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00355-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free