Changes in physical performance, body composition and physical training during military operations: systematic review and meta-analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Systematic review and meta-analysis applying PRISMA guidelines with a PICOS format was constructed to provide an overview of changes in physical performance, body composition and physical training in soldiers during prolonged (≥ 3 months) military operations. Twenty-four studies out of the screened 4431 records filled the inclusion criteria. A small decrease in endurance performance was the most consistent finding (Hedge's g [g] − 0.21, 95% CI − 0.01 to − 0.41) while small overall increases in maximal strength of the lower (g 0.33, 95% CI 0.16–0.50) and upper body (g 0.33, 95% CI 0.19–0.46) were observed. In addition, small increases in strength endurance (push-up, g 0.34, 95% CI 0.15–0.52; sit-up g 0.26, 95% CI 0.07–0.44) were observed. The overall changes in body composition were trivial. Heterogeneity in the outcome variables varied mainly between low to moderate. Large inter-individual variations were observed in physical training volume, including decrements especially in endurance training frequency and volume. A reduction in total training load was often associated with negative changes in body composition and physical performance according to the principle of training specificity. Individuals with higher initial fitness level were more susceptible to decrements in their physical performance during operation.

References Powered by Scopus

49074Citations
9283Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pihlainen, K., Santtila, M., Nindl, B. C., Raitanen, J., Ojanen, T., Vaara, J. P., … Kyröläinen, H. (2023). Changes in physical performance, body composition and physical training during military operations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48712-2

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Researcher 3

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 6

50%

Computer Science 2

17%

Neuroscience 2

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0