Liquidity provision vs. deposit insurance: Preventing bank panics without moral hazard

37Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I ask whether a central bank policy of providing liquidity to banks during panics can prevent bank runs without causing moral hazard. This kind of policy has been widely advocated, most notably by Bagehot (1873). I show a particular central bank liquidity provision policy can prevent bank panics without moral hazard problems. I also show that a deposit insurance policy, while preventing runs, can create moral hazard problems. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, A. (2006). Liquidity provision vs. deposit insurance: Preventing bank panics without moral hazard. Economic Theory, 28(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0613-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free