A comparison of six approaches to discretization-a rough set perspective

16Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present results of extensive experiments performed on nine data sets with numerical attributes using six promising discretization methods. For every method and every data set 30 experiments of ten-fold cross validation were conducted and then means and sample standard deviations were computed. Our results show that for a specific data set it is essential to choose an appropriate discretization method since performance of discretization methods differ significantly. However, in general, among all of these discretization methods there is no statistically significant worst or best method. Thus, in practice, for a given data set the best discretization method should be selected individually. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blajdo, P., Grzymala-Busse, J. W., Hippe, Z. S., Knap, M., Mroczek, T., & Piatek, L. (2008). A comparison of six approaches to discretization-a rough set perspective. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5009 LNAI, pp. 31–38). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79721-0_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free