To have your cake and eat it? A two-period model for retailers' mixed bundling or reserved product pricing strategies in response to supplier encroachment

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In practice, many brand products retailers have adopted mixed bundling (MB) and reserved product pricing (RPP) in response to external competition, such as supplier's encroachment. There is scanty literature which addresses such flexibility among retailers and its impact on a dual-channel supply chain. To fill this void, we considered a two-period dual-channel model in which one of the two manufacturers sells a product through a direct channel; and through an independent retailer who can bundle two manufacturers' products together (Model M) and reduce their reservation prices (Model R). Our central result demonstrates that, although both MB and RPP strategies can indeed improve retailer's profitability, MB strategy creates strategic issues that are significantly different from that of RPP strategy. More specifically, relative to MB strategy, the retailer's RPP strategy is always detrimental to the manufacturer. Finally, to avoid the retailer's strategic choice for RPP, we designed a revenue sharing contract which can achieve perfect coordination of the supply chain ecosystem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chai, J., Qian, Z., Ampaw, E. M., & Chen, H. (2019). To have your cake and eat it? A two-period model for retailers’ mixed bundling or reserved product pricing strategies in response to supplier encroachment. IEEE Access, 7, 91731–91744. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923811

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free