Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency

10Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I articulate a classical-Marxist theory of technical change in the capitalist labour process, highlighting two contradictions. The management contradiction is the conflict managers experience between coordination (to increase efficiency) and discipline (to ensure valorisation). The workforce contradiction is the tension workers experience between productive socialisation and alienation. I submit that both contradictions were substantially muted from the earliest stages of capitalism through the Fordist stage but have become intensified in the postfordist period. Under postfordism, the basis of efficiency is economies of scope and flexibility, and thus there is a real efficiency advantage to empowering workers, via both multiskilling and employee involvement in problem-solving and decision-making. Postfordist capitalism has thus initiated an intensification of the management and workforce contradictions. In response, capitalist management is increasingly impeding the growth of the productive forces by failing to empower workers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vidal, M. (2020). Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency. Historical Materialism, 28(2), 170–204. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001792

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free