Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology determining stature

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Identifications in forensic anthropology occur in two rather different contexts. One context is that of estimation, when a biological profile from unidentified remains is built in the hope of eventually identifying said remains. Another context is in evidentiary proceedings, where biological information from the remains is used to contribute to a probability statement about the likelihood of a correct identification. Both of these contexts can occur when stature is the biological parameter of interest, and so the authors take data related to stature as the example in this chapter. The unifying method in both contexts is the application of Bayes' theorem. Therefore, this chapter opens with a review of some of the characteristics of a Bayesian analysis. © 2006 Humana Press Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Konigsberg, L. W., Ross, A. H., & Jungers, W. L. (2006). Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology determining stature. In Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences From Recovery to Cause of Death (pp. 317–331). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free