Characterization of visual percepts evoked by noninvasive stimulation of the human posterior parietal cortex

26Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Phosphenes are commonly evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to study the functional organization, connectivity, and excitability of the human visual brain. For years, phosphenes have been documented only from stimulating early visual areas (V1-V3) and a handful of specialized visual regions (V4, V5/MT+) in occipital cortex. Recently, phosphenes were reported after applying TMS to a region of posterior parietal cortex involved in the top-down modulation of visuo-spatial processing. In the present study, we systematically characterized parietal phosphenes to determine if they are generated directly by local mechanisms or emerge through indirect activation of other visual areas. Using technology developed in-house to record the subjective features of phosphenes, we found no systematic differences in the size, shape, location, or frame-of-reference of parietal phosphenes when compared to their occipital counterparts. In a second experiment, discrete deactivation by 1 Hz repetitive TMS yielded a double dissociation: phosphene thresholds increased at the deactivated site without producing a corresponding change at the non-deactivated location. Overall, the commonalities of parietal and occipital phosphenes, and our ability to independently modulate their excitability thresholds, lead us to conclude that they share a common neural basis that is separate from either of the stimulated regions. © 2011 Fried et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Results of Experiment 1: comparison of phosphene size and threshold. Phosphenes were reliably elicited in all participants (n = 9) at both occipital (OCC) and posterior parietal (PPC) locations. A. With stimulation intensity set to 110% of phosphene threshold, there were no significant differences (all p’s.0.1) in area with regard to either the location of TMS (OCC, PPC) or the direction of fixation (center, 45u up, 45u right). B. For the subset of phosphenes that were perceived (and drawn) as lines rather than enclosed shapes, there was no significant difference (p.0.5) with regard to the location of TMS (OCC, PPC). C. There were significantly higher stimulation thresholds for parietal phosphenes than their occipital counterparts (p,0.01). Error bars represent SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g001
  • Figure 2. Experiment 1: Laser Tracking and Painting (LTaP) data. Each graph represents LTaP data from a single participant. Bubbles represent phosphene size (area of bubble = phosphene area) and position (center of bubble = phosphene center-of-gravity) for all six conditions: two stimulation sites (OCC, PPC)6three fixations (center, 45u up, 45u right). Axes are in degrees of visual angle. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g002
  • Figure 3. Results of Experiment 2: relationship of occipital and parietal phosphene thresholds. A. As with Experiment 1, phosphenes elicited from posterior parietal cortex (PPC) had higher thresholds than those from occipital cortex (OCC; P,0.00005). B. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.581) between thresholds of PPC and OCC phosphenes (P,0.01). Error bars represent SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g003
  • Figure 4. Results of Experiment 2: outcome of 1 Hz rTMS neuromodulation. A–B. In session A, suppressing excitability in right occipital cortex (OCC) with 1 Hz rTMS produced a significant increase in the OCC phosphene threshold (p,0.001), but did not change the phosphene threshold (p.0.1) assessed in right posterior parietal cortex (PPC). When re-assessed one hour later, thresholds at both sites were statistically unchanged from baseline (p’s.0.1). C–D. In session B, 1 Hz rTMS of PPC produced a similar increase in phosphene thresholds observed at that site (p,0.001), while OCC thresholds were statistically unchanged from baseline (p.0.01). When re-assessed one hour later, both OCC and PPC phosphene thresholds were statistically unchanged from baseline (p’s.0.01). Error bars represent SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g004
  • Table 1. Study Demographics.
  • Figure 5. An example of output from the Laser Tracking and Painting (LTaP) system. Upper panel. LTaP output from one participant when TMS was applied to the pole of the right occipital cortex (OCC) during three fixation conditions (center, 45u up, 45u right). Lower panel. LTaP output from the same participant when TMS was applied to the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) during the same three fixation conditions. Axes, numbers, and concentric circles were not visible on the screen during the experiment. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g005
  • Figure 6. Timeline of experimental sessions in Experiment 2. Each session in Experiment 2 lasted approximately two hours and involved 15 minutes of suppressive 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to either the pole of the right occipital cortex (OCC) or the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC). At the start of each session, motor and phosphene thresholds were collected to establish baseline excitability. Phosphene thresholds were reassessed immediately following rTMS as well as after a 60-minute break to allow the effects of the rTMS to wear off. Phosphene thresholds were always assessed first at the site that did not receive rTMS, that way a finding of ‘‘no change’’ could not simply be attributed to the effects wearing off. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027204.g006

References Powered by Scopus

Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research

4204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX

3522Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation

1830Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in basic and clinical neuroscience: A comprehensive review of fundamental principles and novel insights

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conscious brain-to-brain communication in humans using non-invasive technologies

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fried, P. J., Elkin-Frankston, S., Rushmore, R. J., Hilgetag, C. C., & Valero-Cabre, A. (2011). Characterization of visual percepts evoked by noninvasive stimulation of the human posterior parietal cortex. PLoS ONE, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027204

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

56%

Researcher 28

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 36

46%

Neuroscience 23

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0