T-helper phenotypes in the blood of myeloma patients on ECOG phase III trials E9486/E3A93

25Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

T-helper blood populations are frequently altered in multiple myeloma (MM). We measured the numbers of naive and activated cell subsets in the blood of a cohort of both previously untreated and treated MM patients. Two- colour flow cytometry to detect total CD4+, CD4+, CD45RA+ (naive) and CD4+, CD45RO+ (activated) subsets was then used to quantify the T-cell subsets in controls and MM patients. Previously treated MM patients either on or off treatment (n = 105) had significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) total CD4 and naive/activated cells than controls. Previously treated MM patients sampled for naive/activated cells while currently off therapy (n = 45) had no difference in the levels of CD4 and naive/activated cells compared to the currently treated patients (n = 60). However, newly diagnosed patients (n = 58) had a significantly reduced total CD4 (P = 0.023) and activated CD4 (P = 0.004), but not naive CD4 subsets, compared to controls. CD19+ cell levels above 125/μl were positively associated with higher T-helper cell levels. There was a strong positive association for better overall survival for patients with >395 CD4 cells/μl (P=0.0001). These data indicate that MM patients at diagnosis have altered T helper subsets, with a selective reduction in activated but not naive cells. Subsequent chemotherapy or the disease process contributes to a further reduction in CD4 cells. Importantly, the association of higher CD19+ cell levels with higher T helper cells indicates that certain myeloma patients can be identified with a more quantitatively intact immune system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kay, N. E., Leong, T., Bone, N., Kyle, R. A., Greipp, P. R., Van Ness, B., & Oken, M. M. (1998). T-helper phenotypes in the blood of myeloma patients on ECOG phase III trials E9486/E3A93. British Journal of Haematology, 100(3), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00609.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free