Advertising and prescription drugs: promotion, education, and the public's health.

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The data presented by Joel Weissman and colleagues and by Robert Dubois do not justify the conclusions that the effects of pharmaceutical promotion are beneficial. Among consumers of direct-to-consumer advertising (Weissman and colleagues), those heavily influenced by such promotion were no more likely than others were to have new conditions diagnosed or confirmed and were much less likely to have laboratory studies ordered or lifestyle changes recommended. A second study (Dubois) arguing that drug advertising improves the appropriateness of prescribing relies on unconvincing ecological arguments. A greater presence of noncommercial, public health-oriented communication would make a more useful and cost-effective impact on the nation's health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Avorn, J. (2003). Advertising and prescription drugs: promotion, education, and the public’s health. Health Affairs (Project Hope). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.w3.104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free