Assessment of medication discrepancies with point prevalence measurement: how accurate are the medication lists for Swedish patients?

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Medication discrepancies are common, potentially harmful and may result from poor medication information across medical records. Our aim was to describe current medication discrepancy rates, types and severity in hospital, primary and specialized outpatient care in Sweden, as well as comparing these with previous measurements. Methods: Participants visiting health care in Skåne in November 2020 were randomly selected to include 100 adult patients each in public and private primary health care centers, hospitals and outpatient care. Within 2 weeks after a health care visit or hospital admission, a pharmacist medication reconciliation was performed to identify any discrepancies. Two general practitioners assessed their potential to cause harm. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used. Results: In total, 405 patients (mean age 61.6 years, median 6.5 medications) were included in the analysis. The majority (72%) of the included patients had ≥1 medication list discrepancy. Total number of discrepancies was 1038 (average 2.6 per patient), with a significantly higher discrepancy rate (4.5) noted in specialized outpatient care (p < 0.001). Overall, unintentional addition (44%) or omission (39%) of drug were most frequent. Out of all discrepancies, 20.7% were rated to have moderate (18.2%) or high (2.5%) potential risk of harm. Cardiovascular, nervous system and antidiabetic medications were more often involved in potentially harmful discrepancies. When compared with previous measurements, the proportion of accurate medication lists significantly improved in primary care compared to 2018 (34% vs 20%, p = 0.0011), as well as a decrease in overall discrepancy rate (p = 0.0029). Conclusion: Medication discrepancies were in general abundant despite a recent health care visit, both in hospital care and primary care, with the highest number in specialized outpatient care. A considerable share was classified as potentially harmful thus implying a major threat to medication safety.

References Powered by Scopus

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

13037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care

1608Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unintended Medication Discrepancies at the Time of Hospital Admission

807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Medication Discrepancies in Hospitalised Medical Patients – Status After a Decade With Targeted Medication Reconciliation Measures, a Cross-sectional Multicenter Study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modig, S., Caleres, G., Nymberg, V. M., Petersson, F., Lundstedt, L., & Lenander, C. (2022). Assessment of medication discrepancies with point prevalence measurement: how accurate are the medication lists for Swedish patients? Drugs and Therapy Perspectives, 38(4), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-022-00907-9

Readers over time

‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

67%

Psychology 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0