Foucault’s Familial Scenes:: Kangaroos, Crystals, Continence and Oracles

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Foucault did not write about the family as such, and certainly not as the sociology of the family has come to write about it, viz. as a discrete domain of predominantly functionalist sociological thought and empirical endeavour. To read his work through the lens of the family is therefore to set oneself upon a task that must be approached with some caution. Indeed, as this chapter aims to show through selected moments in Foucault’s books and lectures, his interest was always in the modes by which ‘the family’ has served as a site for the exercise of the power/knowledge relations that have surrounded it. Indeed, if ‘the family’ is an arrangement of figures and concerns, it is co-emergent, in a very real sense, with our understandings of it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bell, V. (2012). Foucault’s Familial Scenes:: Kangaroos, Crystals, Continence and Oracles. In Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life (pp. 39–62). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291288_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free