Purpose: To compare the effcacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netil-dex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular infammation requiring antibiotic therapy. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival infammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary effcacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [+ 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (+ 1). Other effcacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. Results: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confdence interval for the difference between groups (-15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfed the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. Conclusion: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival infammation when ocular infection was suspected. © 2013 Faraldi et al.
CITATION STYLE
Faraldi, F., Papa, V., Rasà, D., Santoro, D., & Russo, S. (2013). Netilmicin/dexamethasone fxed combination in the treatment of conjunctival infammation. Clinical Ophthalmology, 7, 1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44455
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.