Review of novel therapeutics in cardiac arrest (ReNTICA): Systematic review protocol

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Cardiac arrest remains a common and devastating cause of death and disability worldwide. While targeted temperature management has become standard of care to improve functional neurologic outcome, few pharmacologic interventions have shown similar promise. Methods/analysis This systematic review will focus on prospective human studies from 2015 to 2020 available in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE with a primary focus on impact on functional neurologic outcome. Prospective studies that include pharmacologic agents given during or after cardiac arrest will be included. Study selection will be in keeping with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. If sufficient data involving a given agent are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted and compared with current evidence for therapies recommended in international practice guidelines. Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval will not be required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and lay press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, T. W., Snipes, G., Chowdhury, M. A. B., Mccall-Wright, P., Aleong, E., Taylor, N., … Becker, T. K. (2022, January 3). Review of novel therapeutics in cardiac arrest (ReNTICA): Systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free