Comparison of leaf area index, surface temperature, and actual evapotranspiration estimated using the METRIC model and in situ measurements

18Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The verification of remotely sensed estimates of surface variables is essential for any remote sensing study. The objective of this study was to compare leaf area index (LAI), surface temperature (Ts), and actual evapotranspiration (ETa), estimated using the remote sensing-based METRIC model and in situ measurements collected at the satellite overpass time. The study was carried out at a commercial corn field in eastern South Dakota. Six clear-sky images from Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 (Path 29, Row 29) were processed and used for the assessment. LAI and Ts were measured in situ, and ETa was estimated using an atmometer and independent crop coefficients. The results revealed good agreement between the variables measured in situ and estimated by the METRIC model. LAI showed r2 = 0.76, and RMSE = 0.59 m2 m-2, the Ts comparison had an agreement of r2 = 0.87 and RMSE 1.24oC, and ETa presented r2 = 0.89 and RMSE = 0.71 mm day-1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reyes-González, A., Kjaersgaard, J., Trooien, T., Reta-Sánchez, D. G., Sánchez-Duarte, J. I., Preciado-Rangel, P., & Fortis-Hernández, M. (2019). Comparison of leaf area index, surface temperature, and actual evapotranspiration estimated using the METRIC model and in situ measurements. Sensors (Switzerland), 19(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081857

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free