Identifying the Rules for Identifying Customary International Law: Response from Michael Wood and Omri Sender

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We are grateful to AJIL Unbound for organizing this symposium on the work of the International Law Commission on identification of customary international law. We are particularly grateful to all who have contributed to the symposium for their interest and insights. We shall not here reply comprehensively to everything that has been said. Many points will be addressed in the Special Rapporteur's third report, to be submitted to the UN Secretariat toward the end of March 2015 in preparation for the Commission's session beginning in May 2015. We would only say that many of the points made in the symposium thus far seem eminently sensible, and will hopefully be seen as such by the Commission. It has to be noted, however, that the work of the Commission is collegiate, and the eventual output does not belong to the Special Rapporteur (who is just a facilitator) but to the Commission as a whole- A nd eventually to the General Assembly and the international community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wood, M., & Sender, O. (2014). Identifying the Rules for Identifying Customary International Law: Response from Michael Wood and Omri Sender. In AJIL Unbound (Vol. 108, pp. 196–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398772300002154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free