Phosphorus Forms in Manure and Compost and Their Release during Simulated Rainfall

  • Sharpley A
  • Moyer B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The large accumulation of P in manure from animal feeding operations in localized areas has increased the potential for P export following land application. Impairment of freshwater quality by accelerated eutrophication has focused attention on manure management and the potential for P loss in runoff. Thus, we investigated the amounts and relative solubilities of P in manures and their composts using a modified Hedley fractionation and release of P during simulated rainfall (70 mm h−1 for 30 min) in laboratory columns (15-cm diameter). Twenty-four samples each of dairy manure, dairy manure compost, poultry manure, poultry manure compost, poultry litter, and swine manure were collected over 2 yr. Total P concentration ranged from 2600 to 40 000 mg kg−1, mostly as inorganic P (63 to 92%). The distribution of inorganic and organic P fractions depended on manure and compost type. Most of the inorganic P, 80%, was water extractable (2030 mg kg−1), while 55% was hydroxide extractable in swine slurry (16 620 mg kg−1) and 38% acid extractable in poultry manure (9320 mg kg−1). The dissolved inorganic P concentration in leachate from manure and compost (10 Mg ha−1 manure application rate) during 30-rain rainfall ranged from 34 (poultry litter) to 75 mg L−1 (poultry manure). The amount of P leached by five simulated rainfall events was significantly correlated to respective water extractable inorganic (r2 = 0.98) or organic P (r2 = 0.99) of each material. This suggests that water extractable P may be used to estimate the potential for land-applied manures or composts to enrich leachate and surface runoff P.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharpley, A., & Moyer, B. (2000). Phosphorus Forms in Manure and Compost and Their Release during Simulated Rainfall. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(6), 2053–2053. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060056x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free