A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)

385Citations
Citations of this article
308Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility assessment of Uttarakhand area of India has been done by applying five machine learning methods namely Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (FLDA), Bayesian Network (BN), and Naïve Bayes (NB). Performance of these methods has been evaluated using the ROC curve and statistical index based methods. Analysis and comparison of the results show that all five landslide models performed well for landslide susceptibility assessment (AUC = 0.910–0.950). However, it has been observed that the SVM model (AUC = 0.950) has the best performance in comparison to other landslide models, followed by the LR model (AUC = 0.922), the FLDA model (AUC = 0.921), the BN model (AUC = 0.915), and the NB model (AUC = 0.910), respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pham, B. T., Pradhan, B., Tien Bui, D., Prakash, I., & Dholakia, M. B. (2016). A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environmental Modelling and Software, 84, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free