Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: Comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine

20Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical plexus block performed with ropivacaine 0.75% or 1%, or mepivacaine 2%. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients received deep cervical plexus block with 0.2 ml·kg-1 divided among C2-C4 injections using ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%. A blinded observer recorded loss of pin-prick sensation every minute in the C2-C4 dermatomes until readiness for surgery. Then, a superficial cervical block was performed with 0.15 ml·kg-1 lidocaine 1%. The need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia and degree of pain and time of first postoperative pain medication were also recorded. Results: General anesthesia was not required to complete surgery in any case. No differences in the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia was observed (7, 6, and 9 patients with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%, respectively). Readiness to surgery required 15 (10 - 25) min with ropivacaine 0.75%, 18 (8 20) min with ropivacaine 1%, and 15 (5 - 20) min with mepivacaine 2% (P = NS); while patients asked for first postoperative pain medication after 10 (4 - 13) hr and 9 (6.5 - 11) hr with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% compared with 5 (0 - 8) hr with mepivacaine 2% (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.75% or 1% are appropriate choices when performing cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, providing nerve block characteristics similar to those of mepivacaine 2%, but with the advantage of longer postoperative pain relief.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leoni, A., Magrin, S., Mascotto, G., Rigamonti, A., Gallioli, G., Muzzolon, F., … Casati, A. (2000). Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: Comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 47(2), 185–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018858

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free