Critical issues in translational and clinical research for the study of new technologies to enhance bone repair

22Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Osteoporosis increases fracture risk, especially in metaphyseal bone. Fractures seriously impair function and quality of life and incur large direct and indirect costs. Although the prevention of fractures is certainly the option, a fast and uneventful healing process is optimal when fractures do occur. Many new therapeutic strategies have been developed to accelerate fracture-healing or to diminish the complication rate during the course of fracture-healing. However, widely accepted guidelines are needed to demonstrate the positive or negative interactions of bioactive substances, drugs, and other agents that are being used to promote fracture-healing. For each study design, the primary study goal should be indicated. Outcome variables should include both objective and subjective parameters. The guidelines should be harmonized between European and American regulatory authorities to ensure comparability of results of studies and to foster global harmonization of regulatory requirements. Copyright © 2008 by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldhahn, J., Mitlak, B., Aspenberg, P., Kanis, J. A., Rizzoli, R., & Reginster, J. Y. (2008). Critical issues in translational and clinical research for the study of new technologies to enhance bone repair. In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Vol. 90, pp. 43–47). Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free