CAVAT (Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees): valuing amenity trees as public assets

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Valuing amenity trees is important for calculating loss of amenity and replacement value following wilful or negligent damage, and for several aspects of urban forest management: planning, budget setting and decision-making. Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees (CAVAT) is a tool for valuing amenity trees; it was first presented publicly in 2003. It includes two methods: the Full Method, which is used to provide a compensation replacement value for single trees; and the Quick Method, which is used to determine the value of a population of trees as an asset, for asset management purposes. CAVAT is widely adopted across the UK within local authority tree departments, and by major land-holding and transport organisations. It is also incorporated into the Joint Mitigation Protocol for use in the assessment of subsidence cases. This paper presents CAVAT for the first time in a formal publication. It describes the uses for which it has been designed, it comprehensively describes the methodology and shows where this deviates from similar valuation tools. Five case studies are presented as examples of its application and demonstration of its suitability-for-use. Finally, future potential developments that would facilitate wider use of CAVAT are also presented.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doick, K. J., Neilan, C., Jones, G., Allison, A., McDermott, I., Tipping, A., & Haw, R. (2018). CAVAT (Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees): valuing amenity trees as public assets. Arboricultural Journal, 40(2), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2018.1454077

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

49%

Researcher 14

34%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 15

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

40%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0