The comparison between influence of reducer and inner pipe diameter to the pressure and velocity of gold slurry using 3D solid work simulation

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gold mining Pipe with slurry was modified to observe its effect in pressure-discharge pipe. The fluid was transport using centrifugal pump, while the model simulated using solid work 2018 edition. Three models used in this case were: 28-inch pipe without reducer-pipe; 30-inch pipe without reducer pipe, and 28-inch pipe with reducer-pipe. Each model will produce the discharge pressure, slurry velocity, and the friction. The result shows that the 30-inch pipe without reducer will increase the pressure on the discharge pipe. However, the pressure is not as homogenous as 28 inch-pipe without reducers. 10 % of slurry produced less pressure because the friction occurred in the wall caused by the diameter difference. Meanwhile, the models in 28-inch pipe with reducer-pipe clearly show significant improvement of discharge-pipe pressure. However, the pressure is variety from the centre to the edge of the pipe, with the highest pressure located in the centre of pipe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Antonius, D., Turnip, K., Atmadi, P., & Nawiko, R. (2020). The comparison between influence of reducer and inner pipe diameter to the pressure and velocity of gold slurry using 3D solid work simulation. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 725). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free