Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?

31Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres populations have declined across their range due to multiple anthropogenic threats. Their susceptibility to fatal collisions with the expanding power line network and the prevalence of carcasses contaminated with illegal poisons and other threats outside protected areas are thought to be the primary drivers of declines in southern Africa. We used GPS-GSM units to track the movements and delineate the home ranges of five adult (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area = 121,655±90,845 km2) and four immature (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area = 492,300±259,427 km2) Cape vultures to investigate the influence of power lines and their use of protected areas. The vultures travelled more than 1,000 km from the capture site and collectively entered five different countries in southern Africa. Their movement patterns and core foraging ranges were closely associated with the spatial distribution of transmission power lines and we present evidence that the construction of power lines has allowed the species to extend its range to areas previously devoid of suitable perches. The distribution of locations of known Cape vulture mortalities caused by interactions with power lines corresponded to the core ranges of the tracked vultures. Although some of the vultures regularly roosted at breeding colonies located inside protected areas the majority of foraging activity took place on unprotected farmland. Their ability to travel vast distances very quickly and the high proportion of time they spend in the vicinity of power lines and outside protected areas make Cape vultures especially vulnerable to negative interactions with the expanding power line network and the full range of threats across the region. Co-ordinated cross-border conservation strategies beyond the protected area network will therefore be necessary to ensure the future survival of threatened vultures in Africa. © 2013 Phipps et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Home ranges of nine Cape vultures with species distribution map and Cape vulture-power line incidents. (A) Shaded red and dark blue polygons represent the combined 99% kernel density estimated (KDE) contours of all adult and immature vultures, respectively. The diagonal line shaded polygons represent the extent of the Cape vulture species distribution according to BirdLife International [37]. The capture site is indicated by a black triangle. (B) The hollow red polygons represent the combined 50% KDE contours of all nine vultures. Black crosses show locations of Cape vulture-power line incidents recorded in the Central Incident Register of the EWT-Eskom strategic partnership [39]. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076794.g001
  • Figure 2. Stationary GPS locations in relation to protected areas and transmission power lines in the northern provinces of South Africa. Stationary GPS locations (red circles) from nine Cape vultures tracked by GPS-GSM tracking units are shown with transmission power lines (blue lines) and protected areas (green ploygons [40,41]). 1 = Marakele NP and Welgevonden NR; 2 = Pilanesberg NP; 3 = Magaliesberg NR; 4 = Madikwe GR; 5 = Atherstone NR; 6 = Marico-Bosveld NR; 7 = Botsalano GR; 8 = Oog van Malmanie GR; 9 = Borakalalo GR; 10 = Lapalala, Moepel et al. reserves. The capture site is indicated by a black triangle. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076794.g002
  • Figure 3. Stationary GPS locations and core areas in relation to transmission power lines in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. Stationary GPS locations (green circles) and merged 50% kernel density estimated (KDE) contours (hollow red polygons) from nine Cape vultures are shown in relation to transmission power lines (blue lines). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076794.g003

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative cognition for conservationists

111Citations
378Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
70Citations
239Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phipps, W. L., Wolter, K., Michael, M. D., MacTavish, L. M., & Yarnell, R. W. (2013). Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)? PLoS ONE, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076794

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

62%

Researcher 20

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56

62%

Environmental Science 32

35%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

2%

Psychology 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0