Quantifying the origin of metallic glass formation

134Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The waiting time to form a crystal in a unit volume of homogeneous undercooled liquid exhibits a pronounced minimum., X ∗ at a nose temperature' T ∗ located between the glass transition temperature T g, and the crystal melting temperature, T L. Turnbull argued that., X ∗ should increase rapidly with the dimensionless ratio t rg =T g /T L. Angell introduced a dimensionless ' fragility parameter', m, to characterize the fall of atomic mobility with temperature above T g. Both t rg and m are widely thought to play a significant role in determining., X ∗. Here we survey and assess reported data for T L, T g, t rg, m and., X ∗ for a broad range of metallic glasses with widely varying., X ∗. By analysing this database, we derive a simple empirical expression for., X ∗(t rg, m) that depends exponentially on t rg and m, and two fitting parameters. A statistical analysis shows that knowledge of t rg and m alone is therefore sufficient to predict., X ∗ within estimated experimental errors. Surprisingly, the liquid/crystal interfacial free energy does not appear in this expression for., X ∗.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, W. L., Na, J. H., & Demetriou, M. D. (2016). Quantifying the origin of metallic glass formation. Nature Communications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10313

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free