Poverty eradication in fragile places: Prospects for harvesting the highest hanging fruit by 2030

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper explores the range of likely and potential progress on poverty eradication in fragile states to 2030. Using the International Futures model and recently released 2011 International Comparison Program data, this paper calculates current (2015) poverty for a US$1.90 poverty line, and subsequently runs three scenarios. The estimates suggest that there are 485 million poor in fragile states in 2015, a 33.5 per cent poverty rate. This paper’s Base Case scenario results in a forecasted 22.8 per cent poverty rate in fragile states by 2030. The most optimistic scenario yields a 13.1 per cent poverty rate for this group of countries (257 million). An optimistic scenario reflecting political constraints in fragile states yields a 19.1 per cent poverty rate (376 million). Even under the most optimistic circumstances, fragile states will almost certainly be home to hundreds of millions of poor in 2030, suggesting that the world must do things dramatically differently if we are to reach the high hanging fruit and truly ‘leave no one behind’ in the next fifteen years of development.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

International futures: Building and using global models

27Citations
19Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milante, G., Hughes, B., & Burt, A. (2016). Poverty eradication in fragile places: Prospects for harvesting the highest hanging fruit by 2030. Stability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.435

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

43%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0